<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jason in a Nutshell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>All about programming and whatever else comes to mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:51:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Java vs C# vs Python vs Ruby: an &#8220;objective&#8221; analysis by Michał</title>
		<link>http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/java-vs-c-vs-python-vs-ruby-an-objective-analysis/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Michał</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/?p=126#comment-103</guid>
		<description>One issue: You wrote that C# package system is &quot;Windows DLLs - can be painful&quot;.
In fact these .NET dlls are assemblies, which are different from win32. In fact, the only similarity is the extension. And YES - assemblies are here to make you forget about dll hell!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One issue: You wrote that C# package system is &#8220;Windows DLLs &#8211; can be painful&#8221;.<br />
In fact these .NET dlls are assemblies, which are different from win32. In fact, the only similarity is the extension. And YES &#8211; assemblies are here to make you forget about dll hell!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Java vs C# vs Python vs Ruby: an &#8220;objective&#8221; analysis by GStu</title>
		<link>http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/java-vs-c-vs-python-vs-ruby-an-objective-analysis/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>GStu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/?p=126#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t you consider Maven to be a &quot;CPAN-like module archive&quot; for Java?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t you consider Maven to be a &#8220;CPAN-like module archive&#8221; for Java?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Software update hell by Jonathan Hayward</title>
		<link>http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/software-update-hell/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Hayward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/?p=96#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I can&#039;t comment on your rant at length; my computer just installed some updates and is begging me to let it reboot itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I can&#8217;t comment on your rant at length; my computer just installed some updates and is begging me to let it reboot itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IronPython in Action reviewed by Several New Reviews &#8212; IronPython in Action News</title>
		<link>http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/ironpython-in-action-reviewed/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Several New Reviews &#8212; IronPython in Action News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/?p=226#comment-81</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason Baker on IronPython in Action [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason Baker on IronPython in Action [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows for Python programmers: IIS by Michael Foord</title>
		<link>http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/2009/06/04/windows-for-python-programmers-iis/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Foord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/?p=213#comment-78</guid>
		<description>An don&#039;t forget IronPython... A good choice for .NET shops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An don&#8217;t forget IronPython&#8230; A good choice for .NET shops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows for Python programmers: IIS by Jason Baker</title>
		<link>http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/2009/06/04/windows-for-python-programmers-iis/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/?p=213#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t know that.  Thanks for bringing it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t know that.  Thanks for bringing it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows for Python programmers: IIS by Graham Dumpleton</title>
		<link>http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/2009/06/04/windows-for-python-programmers-iis/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Dumpleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/?p=213#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Acknowledge that Apache/mod_wsgi on Windows has no daemon mode and that that isn&#039;t about to change, so application pools in IIS do sound quite interesting.

For those who don&#039;t have a choice and have to use Apache, worthwhile pointing out:

  http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2009/02/source-code-reloading-with-modwsgi-on.html
  http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/ReloadingSourceCode#Restarting_Windows_Apache

One of the features of daemon mode of mod_wsgi is the ability to easily have the application be reloaded without having to restart Apache as a whole. One can&#039;t avoid that on Windows, but with the recipe described in those links, one can use some slight of hand to at least make it automatic during the development phase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acknowledge that Apache/mod_wsgi on Windows has no daemon mode and that that isn&#8217;t about to change, so application pools in IIS do sound quite interesting.</p>
<p>For those who don&#8217;t have a choice and have to use Apache, worthwhile pointing out:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2009/02/source-code-reloading-with-modwsgi-on.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2009/02/source-code-reloading-with-modwsgi-on.html</a><br />
  <a href="http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/ReloadingSourceCode#Restarting_Windows_Apache" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/ReloadingSourceCode#Restarting_Windows_Apache</a></p>
<p>One of the features of daemon mode of mod_wsgi is the ability to easily have the application be reloaded without having to restart Apache as a whole. One can&#8217;t avoid that on Windows, but with the recipe described in those links, one can use some slight of hand to at least make it automatic during the development phase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Java vs C# vs Python vs Ruby: an &#8220;objective&#8221; analysis by Arash</title>
		<link>http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/java-vs-c-vs-python-vs-ruby-an-objective-analysis/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Arash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/?p=126#comment-73</guid>
		<description>You got some of your C# info wrong.

C# does in fact have map, reduce, and filter.

C# also has closures.

C# will have optional parameters in version 4.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got some of your C# info wrong.</p>
<p>C# does in fact have map, reduce, and filter.</p>
<p>C# also has closures.</p>
<p>C# will have optional parameters in version 4.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can we please stop comparing Wolfram Alpha to Google? by ggw_bach</title>
		<link>http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/2009/05/20/can-we-please-stop-comparing-wolfram-alpha-to-google/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>ggw_bach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/?p=190#comment-66</guid>
		<description>the inventor (the same person who created mathematica) is a bit of an attention whore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the inventor (the same person who created mathematica) is a bit of an attention whore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Java vs C# vs Python vs Ruby: an &#8220;objective&#8221; analysis by Jason Baker</title>
		<link>http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/java-vs-c-vs-python-vs-ruby-an-objective-analysis/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonmbaker.wordpress.com/?p=126#comment-61</guid>
		<description>@Developer:  Not necessarily.  I put it on there because the language has it.  As for whether or not that&#039;s a good thing would be the subject of another blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Developer:  Not necessarily.  I put it on there because the language has it.  As for whether or not that&#8217;s a good thing would be the subject of another blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
